• Asset Pricing
• Household Finance
• Behavioral Finance
• Ostad, P., & Mella, J. (2023). The value relevance of corporate tax expenses in the presence of
partisanship: International evidence. Global Finance Journal, 57, 100832.
• Presented at The Southwestern Finance Association annual conference, March 2021
• Received Sandra M. Stephens Memorial Award for Global Research Leaders 2020, McMaster University
•Revise and Resubmit at Journal of Banking and Finance
• Coauthored with Richard Deaves and Adam Stivers
• Presented at The Current Innovations in Probability-based Household Internet Panel Research (CIPHER) Conference, March 2023
• Working Paper
• Presented at Brown Bag Lunch (BBL) Seminars at McMaster University
• Accepted at the FMA European Conference, June 2024
• Working Paper
• Presented at Brown Bag Lunch (BBL) Seminars at McMaster University
This paper contributes to the existing literature on the information contents of corporate taxes by investigating whether the political orientation of tax decision-makers affects the informativeness of corporate tax expenses. I confirm that firms bear higher tax expenses under left-leaning governments supporting the partisan theory of political cycles even in the wake of globalization. Furthermore, I introduce a simple model suggesting that the information contents of corporate tax expenses are conditional on the political orientation of the government, driven by investors’ perspectives on a firm’s future cash flows and cash-flow volatility. By analyzing cross-sectional country-level partisanship differences, I find that corporate tax expenses are only informative about future returns under right-leaning governments. This suggests that corporate tax expenses are arguably a more direct profitability indicator when right-leaning governments are in power.
This study focuses on the Household Finance area. Using data from the Understanding America Study (UAS) survey panel, I explore the roles of cognitive and non-cognitive skills in the empirically observed stock market participation (SMP) puzzle. Specifically, I examine both the direct and indirect effects of the “primitive” factors of intelligence and non-cognitive skills (derived from conscientiousness and emotional stability scores) on stock holdings. This examination extends to their influence through well-observed proximate factors of SMP such as general and task-specific financial literacy, education, income, and trust. I find that non-cognitive skills have both direct and indirect, via the proximate factors, positive impacts on stock market participation. In contrast, intelligence solely affects participation indirectly through proximate factors. Overall, higher levels of intelligence and non-cognitive skills significantly enhance the likelihood of owning stock equities.
This paper delves deeper into the determinants of SMP and investigates the role of specific stock market knowledge in household stock-holding decisions using the UAS, survey panel. I examine whether a demonstration of knowledge about a reasonable distribution for market return increases equity participation. demonstrate that possessing market return expectations that are in line with historical performance and the current environment, labeled as market literacy in return, enhances the likelihood of stock holding and this effect persists even after accounting for established factors such as general and task-specific financial knowledge, intelligence, and education. Moreover, overoptimistic households, whose market return expectation is greater than the market literacy range, are less likely to participate since the higher expected outcome is dominated by the perceived cost of acquiring information for market entry. I also explore
the impact of market literacy in risk and overprecision on SMP. Market literacy in risk refers to providing reasonable volatility estimates for stock returns, while overprecision signifies overestimating market outcomes volatility. The findings suggest that the roles of market literacy in risk and overprecision on equity holding decisions are indirect and fully subsumed by other drivers of SMP.
This study explores how technological innovation spreads internationally and impacts stock returns. It is argued that Global technological innovation or knowledge shocks originate from the most advanced economies or technology leaders and eventually spill over to all other industries and countries. The spillovers of knowledge can positively affect a related firm’s operating performance and market value. The technology transfer happens through multiple channels such as Bilateral Trades, FDI, and IT. Knowledge can also be transferred through channels that are not easily traceable due to their secret nature, such as knowledge generated through industrial espionage. However, with a few exceptions, no quantitative analysis of the importance of international industrial espionage is available. This study employs international stock returns to measure positive spillovers, specifically assessing the impact of industrial espionage.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.